Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Poltergeist Confidential

A collection of interesting tidbits provided by some of my sources.

Poltergeist
 
************************
 
"Just saw the 'Poltergeist' HD remaster on Monsters HD the other day. Looked great, and MILES better than the crappy old DVD! BTW, I happen to be a huge 'Poltergeist' fan as well. I actually have some info for you that might be of interest. I am an author, and started a 'Poltergeist' book a few years ago. I even did interviews with James Karen, Zelda Rubinstein, Jerry Goldsmith, and started an aborted one with Craig T. Nelson. Long story short, but some forces at Amblin threatened (or hinted at) legal action about the book. So my publisher dropped it, and I went on to do [another book].
Anyway, the interviews were interesting -- I still have them on cassette tape. Particularly the whole 'Who really directed 'Poltergeist'' thing. Rubinstein was hilarious -- 'Tobe Hooper couldn't even direct traffic!' -- while James Karen was all pro-Hooper. Goldsmith claims he never even met Hooper, only Spielberg. Nelson was just a jerk, quite frankly. So I will certainly be interested in seeing what, if any, of the controversy is tackled on the new DVD."
*****************************

Poltergeist II
"Ah! I remember Grais and Victor being there. A couple of really bright 'nice kids,' who seemed a bit frustrated with Brian Gibson's oddly irrational suggestions (we all often found ourselves just staring at him, after he blurted out one nonsensical idea or another). Gibson appeared to be "in way over his head" as a feature film director at the time. I spoke with [another crew member] once following the film's release, and related my surprise at how good it turned out, considering what a 'twit' the director seemed to be. With a sly chuckle, he revealed 'Yeah, post production really saved that picture. That guy didn't have a clue.' How ironic that he managed to win an Emmy for the 'The Josephine Baker Story' a few years later. I wonder who saved that one for him?
I'm surprised to hear of his passing-he couldn't have been all that old. Not a bad guy; just 'dorky.' And yes, 'What's Love Got to Do With It' wasn't a bad movie at all. But I still can't help but think that he was helped a great deal by others involved in the production...He just didn't strike me as competent in the role of movie director, in any way. I really don't remember anything he said, specifically. It just all struck me as silly and arbitrary-the sort of clueless suggestions that you'd hear from Chris Farley's 'obsessed fan' character from 'Saturday Night Live' ('ya know what would be really cool?...'). The only thing I actually recall, was his embarrassing example of a 'girly shriek' he thought should be heard during the Worm metamorphosis scene. And all the lines he came up with sounded like admonitions from John Cleese's 'Tim, The Enchanter' from Monty Python's 'Quest for The Holy Grail.' I guess you could say we were 'nonplussed.'"
Poltergeist III
"[Gary Sherman] HATED the [performance of the] actor cast as the psychologist; remarking several times with an anguished sigh, that the lousy performance 'just kills every scene he's in'-but he was stuck with it."
***********************
[Regarding the claims of Gary Sherman that the ending was not a re-shoot and in reference to the experience of working with Gary during both principal photography and the re-shoot, this person said] "Gary is the king of spin..."
[This same person went on to talk about how they and others felt after Sherman screened a rough cut of the film before the re-shoot, and how Sherman seemed proud of "how well" it turned out] :
"It was The Emperor's New Clothes, all over again, as Gary Sherman strutted along stark naked. My apologies to Gary, believe me, my intention is not to run him down, but when it was over, that's the way we all felt."
I recently discovered this posting on Zelda Rubinstein's listing at the IMDB:
"Hello,

I met this fine woman once in Tampa. I met her at a party thrown by some friends of mine who own a company 'Creatures of Delight', she was friends of theirs, and I must say my first impression of her was........what a bitch. But, after a few drinks she apologized to me, and I realized what I had done to provoke that response. I remembered her from the Poltergeist films, and said I loved her. She sat with me and other people at the party and went on to explain how MGM had "ripped" her off. She explained how they paid her for the first film and in that contract she "actually" was signing off any other sequels. So she had to make part 2 and part 3 for free, because she didn't read the fine print. So, I understand how many of you have good and bad things to say about her. I mean come on. This is what she does for a living. She REALLY is a nice person, but we ALL have bad days. I mean, there are days when I meet people and I am pissed off (for whatever reason) Whether you are in the public eye or not....give them a break. I could sit and tell you the whole story about her (which I have no idea what, but she is a very nice person to listen to.....especially after a few drinks)..But give her a break...Trust me my first impression of her was not very nice. "


**********************
Finally, I stumbled across these court filings while doing some research online. At first I thought the studio tried to sue Heather O'Rourke and Oliver Robins, but after receiving copies of the full court documents, it turns out that all three of these cases were simply standard documents MGM had to file with the L.A. County Superior Court before production on P2 and P3 began. Apparently under CA law, the Court has to approve the contracts for any minor child actors. Heather was paid $75,000 to do "Poltergeist II," a substantial increase from the rumored $35,000 she was paid to do the first film:




LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL CASE INDEX

CASE NAME: METRO GOLDWYN MAYER FILM CO v. O ROURKE HEATHER, et al

CIVIL CASE NUMBER: C 544091

FILING DATE: 04/22/1985

DISTRICT: CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES)

CASE TYPE: CIVIL

PARTY: PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT COMMENT
--------- --------- -------
METRO GOLDWYN MAYER FILM CO O ROURKE HEATHER

METRO GOLDWYN MAYER FILM CO P H M A INC





LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL CASE INDEX

CASE NAME: METRO GOLDWYN MAYER FILM CO v. JOURNEY BEYOND PROD INC, et al

CIVIL CASE NUMBER: C 544092

FILING DATE: 04/22/1985

DISTRICT: CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES)

CASE TYPE: CIVIL

PARTY:
PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT COMMENT
--------- --------- -------
METRO GOLDWYN MAYER FILM CO JOURNEY BEYOND PROD INC

METRO GOLDWYN MAYER FILM CO ROBINS OLIVER




LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL CASE INDEX

CASE NAME: METRO GOLDWYN MAYER PICTURE, et al v. O ROURKE HEATHER, et al

CIVIL CASE NUMBER: C 633518

FILING DATE: 01/23/1987

DISTRICT: CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES)

CASE TYPE: CIVIL

PARTY: PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT COMMENT
--------- --------- -------
METRO GOLDWYN MAYER PICTURE O ROURKE HEATHER

METRO GOLDWYN MAYER PICTURE O ROURKE PROD INC HEATHER

METRO GOLDWYN MAYER PICTURES O ROURKE PROD INC HEATHER

Thursday, August 4, 2016

The Filming Timeline

Note: Some of the items here may be in error, but they represent my best guess about the sequence of events as they happened. I'll update this page with new info as I get it:

1. May 23rd, 1986-"Poltergeist II: The Other Side" is released nationwide and has a great opening weekend. Early the next Monday, MGM execs call writer/producers Michael Grais and Mark Victor at their office on the MGM lot and ask if they'd be interested in working on "Poltergeist III." The thought of going into "Poltergeist Land" so soon after spending an exhausting two years from writing to delivery of the second film prompts "both their mouths to hit their desks." They both feel it is time to move on, especially when informed that MGM plans to make the next film on a lower budget, and without JoBeth Williams and Craig T. Nelson (in a promotional interview that month, JoBeth stated that she didn't think she'd do a part III, but yet didn't rule it out completely).
It's unclear whether MGM or Grais/Victor made the final decision (and how much back and forth negotiation there was), but ultimately Grais and Victor will not be involved with P3. Grais has said it was his and Mark Victor's decision not to be involved. When I asked P1 and P2 novelization writer James Kahn if he was ever approached to write a novelization for P3, he told me "No, my understanding was there were rights disputes that MGM won and didn't want to involve any of the original players." In addition, in September 1986, MGM/Spielberg would finally settle the lawsuit brought by Paul Clemens and Bennett Michael Yellin over the writing of the original film. 
2. By fall of 1986, child star Oliver Robins has decided to leave acting to focus on his education. Consequently MGM never asks him to be in P3. However, the studio decides that they can still make another film as long as they have Heather O'Rourke and Zelda Rubinstein (who both were likely more "affordable" than JoBeth Williams and Craig T. Nelson. Heather, for example, only made $75,000 for P2, and Zelda may have been contractually obligated to do any sequels). 
MGM execs Jay Kanter and Alan Ladd Jr. contact director Gary Sherman to ask if he'd be interested in writing, directing, and executive producing P3. Gary had been on the short list as one of Grais and Victor's director choices for P2, so that would explain why Kanter and Ladd went to him first. Gary had also worked for Kanter and Ladd at another studio. Gary is told he can pretty much take the story in any direction he wants to. What the execs mandate is that the story only involve Carol Anne, Tangina, and the Rev. Kane (who would have to be re-cast due to the death of Julian Beck), and that Carol Anne be put into a completely new setting. Gary comes up with the idea of having Carol Anne stay with relatives in Chicago while temporarily attending a school for gifted children with emotional problems.  The SFX budget on P2 had ended up costing about twice as much as originally planned, with many of the concepts being changed or scrapped altogether. Sherman tells the execs he plans to control costs by shooting most of the effects sequences live on the stage rather than in post production.
3. October-December 1986-Gary and his writing partner Brian Taggert begin developing and writing the script for what is titled "We're Back: Poltergeist Continues." Zelda Rubinstein is invited to the November screening of the opening of Gary's new movie "Wanted: Dead or Alive." After the screening, Gary introduces himself to her and says they will soon be working together in "Poltergeist III." She hadn't even known there was going to be another sequel at that point, and is charmed by both Gary and his new film.  In addition, it seems that Zelda may not have read the fine print of her contract for the original film, which allegedly obligated her to do sequels. This information was claimed by a guy on the IMDB who said he spoke to Zelda once at a party in Florida. He said she expressed frustration with MGM for the way they treated her on the sequels. Also that month, MGM Chairman Ladd tells visiting journalists that Sherman and Taggart are developing P3 and that it will be filmed in 1987.
4. January-March 1987-the film is in pre-production. It will be shot on location for about three months in Chicago, with much of it done on sound stages there. The film will be shot for about half the cost of the last sequel, 9.5 million to P2's 20 million. Producer Barry Bernardi hires legendary makeup man Dick Smith as a consultant on the film. Smith in turn recommends Doug Drexler and John Caglione to actually create the makeups. They are hired and plan to work mainly out of their new studio in Brooklyn, with visits to Chicago during filming. In January 1987, as a California state required procedure, MGM submits Heather's P3 contract to the L.A. County Superior Court for approval (just as they did with she and Oliver on P2, because they were minor child actors). The Court approves the contract and clears Heather for work, under the guardianship of her mother Kathleen. In February, Heather fails the cast physical but is cleared for work before leaving for Chicago in April. In March, some revisions are made to the script, likely in an effort to tone down the cost of the production.
5. Principal photography is completed on location in Chicago between April 13th-June 24th, 1987. All of Heather's scenes are finished. Sometime early during principal photography, writer Steve Feke is brought to Chicago to do a "polish" of the script-
From: http://www.internetviz.com/Newsletters/Cincom/Shootthemaddonkey.htm
KEN: I sent the novel to Steve Feke, who was, at the time, in Chicago polishing the script, Poltergeist III.
Feke would end up being uncredited on the final film. He had been associated with Gary Sherman productions before, as this excerpt from a 1994 press kit for the TV series "Hawkeye" states:
http://www.wonderland-site.com/html/hawk2.htm
He began his career as a journalist, covering the plight of Cuban refugees in Spain. Returning to the U.S., Feke was hired by Hatos-Hall Productions where he wrote, produced and co-created 11 network pilots. By, the time he left to make his first feature film, Feke had become head of development and production for Hatos-Hall. Feke' s versatility as a writer/director/producer led to a distinguished career in television and feature films. Feke co-wrote and/co-produced the Columbia Pictures film, When A Stranger Calls, for which he received the Critics Award, Special Jury Award at the Avoriaz Film Festival. He served as writer/producer on the Guber/Peters/Warner Bros. feature film Snowman, and re-wrote scripts for both Poltergeist III for MGM/UA and Warrior for Warner Bros. As a writer/ director, Feke's credits include Papa Was a Preacher for Producer Martin Jurow, and Keys to Freedom, with stars Jane Seymour and Omar Sharif, for Pen-World Productions. Feke's current film projects include All Honourable Men for Producer Freddie Fields and Ants of God which is in pre-production for Todd AO/TAE Productions.His television credits include writer/supervising producer duties for the ABC series Sable. He also served as supervising producer on NBCs Dark Shadows and FBC's Against the Law. Most recently, Feke served as co-writer on all stories for the first season of Missing Persons, also from Stephen J. Cannell Productions, Inc.
At the end of June, a wrap party is held for the cast to celebrate the completion of shooting. This cast party was hosted by a Chicago company called "Dance all Night" and is confirmed here:
http://www.danceallnight.com/pictures.html


6. July-September 1987-Post production begins-sound mixing, editing, scoring, etc. As reported by "People" magazine, to celebrate the end of shooting, Heather and her family spend July and August driving from Chicago to Disney World in Florida and then back to CA. In September, Heather begins the 7th grade in San Diego.

7. October, 1987-Post production work is nearing completion. At the ADR looping sessions, Corey Burton, who provided the voice for Kane, is informed by Gary that they won't waste studio time looping much for the ending, since it will "likely be re-worked anyway." Possibly in early November, Gary Sherman flies to NYC with a VHS rough cut of the film. SFX artists Doug Drexler, John Caglione, and Gary drive up to Dick Smith's house in Larchmont, NY to screen it. While Gary is enthusiastic about the film, the others don't think it turned out all that great. While in NYC, Gary apparently also screens the rough cut of P3 at the World Trade Center for a group of film industry professionals and distributors. This is the screening that Macklin Crux saw. The assembled group likely viewed the same tape Gary screened in Larchmont. Macklin says: 
"Yes, several people were from the studio and several people were from the
SFX group in Brooklyn.  I want to say color array projector (would suggest
VHS Tape) but I vaguely recall a very loud film projector .... not sure."

He remembers the ending of Kane touching the necklace (and thinking "how cheesy") and the frozen bodies, as well as the scene of Carol Anne, crying, waving goodbye to Tangina in slow motion. He recalls that for some of the effects scenes (possibly a couple of the rare shots involving optical effects), they saw sketches to indicate what the final effect would look like.  He also said there were no credits on the film and very little music.
Apparently even in this early cut, although Gary had intended P3 to be the end of the trilogy, MGM decided they wanted an opening for another sequel. According to Mr. Crux, he seems to recall that the lightning strike which appeared in the final film version was also in this early cut (although as he admitted to me, he may have misremembered whether the lightning was in the original ending, the re-shot ending or both:
"There was a clash of thunder over the skyscraper in the ending I saw and it was suggested that 'it wasn't over' (Kane's wicked laugh)."
There appears to be supporting evidence for this in the "making of" featurette for the film. "Poltergeist III: The Special Effects" has a copyright date of 1987, and included a quick, rough sketch-type shot of two lightning bolts striking the highrise. Shortly after the WTC screening, post production work is completed.
8. The week of November 16, 1987-the completed film is submitted to the MPAA ratings board. The next week, in Bulletin #986, November 23rd, the film is given a "PG" rating. This may have displeased the studio execs, who were likely looking to get the demographics (young, teen males) of a PG-13 rating. In addition, Gary Sherman may have been under contract to deliver a PG-13 film. The studio was essentially unhappy with the film and with the film's ending.

9. December 1987-Gary and his team go back to Doug Drexler's and John Caglione's lab in Brooklyn to discuss changes to the ending. At the entrance to the lab, Doug places a photograph of one of the "evil Carol Anne" makeup shots with a post it note that Gary will see when he walks in. The post it says "This makeup did not get ONE closeup!"
Gary tells them that since "Tangina accomplishes Kane's death," he'd like to see Kane transformed on camera into a corpse. In the original ending, Kane touched Tangina's necklace, and his face then "exploded with light." Here's how Doug describes that effect:


"Yes, the splintering Kane head. I remember it well. Dick Smith hand tooled that prop. My god, it was a lot of work, but Dick was intrigued by the idea, and wanted to do it himself. It was a hollow plaster cast. Dick literally carved all the channels from which light would shine through from behind. The challenge, or should I say, the hell of it, was that Dick needed to carve the channels to within a hairs breadth from the surface of the face without breaching the surface. The effect was startling, but Gary Sherman ultimately was not happy with the results. This was no fault of Dick's. In the [original]cut, the thing just sat there stationary, in all of it's glowy, fissure filled glory, and looked just like what it was; a stationary prop... a statue. It's my opinion that some creative cutting in the edit could have made it work, but this was not forthcoming. Someone got the idea that whacking Kane's head off with a shovel would be cooler [in the re-shoot]. So there you go."
10. Gary requests that the new version of Kane's decomposition be done without the use of stop motion, optical effects, or under cranking the camera. Doug notes that he thinks "Zelda should not come back at the end. It's very confusing." In addition, it's possible that the ending wasn't the only thing that there may have been plans to re-shoot, since MGM wasn't pleased with the film in general.

11. Doug Drexler, John Caglione, and Dick Smith get to work on creating the new version of Kane's decomposition. Doug makes notes and sketches from December 1987 into January 1988 on how the effect will be done. It is planned that after Kane touches the necklace, a waist up dummy of him will be used. It will rock back and forth, an internal mechanism used to move its eyes and mouth. Air will blow upwards, shooting his hat off the top of his head. Meanwhile, intense heat from nearby propane blowers will melt the rubber face of Kane, thereby creating the decomposing effect without the use of stop motion or other post production tricks. Dick creates 6 of the wax Kane masks. One of them is placed over the "articulated Kane puppet head" and some tests are run using the propane blowers to melt it. These SFX shots are photographed. One of the masks ended up being used on set in the re-shoot, and the remaining four were later stored in John Caglione's garage, where they remained for years.

12. The film's production manager, Ed Ledding, tells Doug that the budget for this new sequence has not yet been approved, and the actors are not available for the initial shoot date. As a result, the effect should be in "hold" mode. The re-shoot seems to have been initially scheduled for early February.

13. February 1, 1988, Heather passes away. Here's some of what Gary Sherman had to say about what transpired that day and after, from an interview he did with Jason Bene at
http://www.killerfilm.com/features/read/late-night-classics-poltergeist-iii-35518

"The day that Heather died I was in Chicago doing some pre-production on a television show I was producing.....Barry Bernardi was in Chicago with me and we were going through some of the pre-production. I get a call from David Wardlow, who was Heather’s agent and a good friend of mine. He said, “We’re setting up a conference call with Dick Bergerin [Executive Vice-President of MGM] in a half an hour, are you going to be available?” I said, “Yeah, what’s it about?” He said, “I can’t tell you.” Barry and I sat down in my apartment in Chicago and we gathered around the phone, and a half hour later it was Jay Kanter, Alan Ladd Jr., Richard Berger, Barry Bernardi, and myself all on the conference call. David announced to us that Heather had died that morning. Basically, Jay and Ladd just said, “Why don’t you just get on a plane and fly to Los Angeles and we’ll figure out what we are going to do.” I flew into LA [with] Barry and we went into Laddie’s office and we sat down and we said, “What are we going to do?” ‘Laddie’ said, “I don’t want to release a movie with a dead twelve year old in it.” Jay was in total agreement. Both of these guys are very much family oriented people. I said, “I don’t think I could even stand to sit in the cutting room and finish the movie and look at Heather every day.”
The day after the funeral we had a meeting at the studio. The decision was to not finish the film.....Laddie’ and Jay said, “Go back to Chicago and do your television show and we’ll figure this out.” The board at MGM did not have the same feeling because they had a lot of money invested in the film. They owned the footage. Basically, that’s what transpired. We talked about it and we said, “Well, what do we do?” I don’t want somebody else taking all of my footage that I worked on for two years and doing something with it and that I would hate more than I am doing myself."
14.  It's perhaps even more important now to re-shoot the climax because of the fact that Carol Anne's "frozen body" is seen in the original ending (I also seem to recall years ago someone else telling me that Jim Peele, Heather's step-father, said a scene of Carol Anne encased in ice was cut from the film). Macklin Crux has his own theory on how MGM may have dealt with the film at this point:
"After her death, it was clear they could not ride the Heather train to success for two reasons...It didn't work and she had passed away but would if they played up"The Final Chapter" [aspect] and changed a few things to bring an end to the saga. This would have been a clever marketing strategy to sell the film to the public."

15. In early March, Doug and John are told that the re-shoot will soon commence. They have a very short time to finish the "articulated Kane puppet head" they've been working on. They manage to get it ready in 12 days. They also create two "decomposed" bodies for Bruce and Donna to replace the "frozen" bodies of the family. Gary re-writes, again, the script they had been planning to use for the ending of the movie. On March 7th, a Writer's Guild of America (WGA) strike begins. The strike would last for months (interestingly, I discovered that the re-shoot script pages on file at the Margaret Herrick Library in Beverly Hills all have a date of "REVISED 3/14/88" stamped on them, AFTER the beginning of the WGA strike).

16. In the emotional and logistical turmoil after Heather's death, not many people are still around for the film. Apparently, the studio execs decide to leave Kipley Wentz's character "Scott" out of the new ending, perhaps because they think it will confuse the audience to see him again, thus making the Scott who comes out of the pool (originally intended to be the "evil Scott") the "real" one instead.  The sequence where Tangina shows up to lead Kane into the Light is added, along with the scene of Bruce walking out of the mirror with Carol Anne and Donna.

17. Monday March 14, 1988: the re-shoot begins. The scene where the mist clears and Pat says "She did it...she saved us!" is probably filmed first, since it didn't really
require any heavy duty effects, along with the fact that Lara Flynn Boyle may have only been available for one day. The scene of Bruce walking out of the mirror with the double of Carol Anne is likely filmed later in the week. A double for Lara Flynn Boyle was used in that scene, probably because she had to get back to her other movie. She was in L.A. filming the movie "How I Got Into College." In fact, its first day of production was Feb. 1st, the same day Heather died.  There seems to be a mistake made by the costume department-the double for Carol Anne is wearing white sneakers over her red PJs for the scene where they're walking out of the mirror, which she didn't have on in the rest of the movie.

18. The more elaborate makeup effects are filmed later. The final scene of Kane decomposing is filmed Friday, March 18th. By this time, instead of having Kane touch the necklace, Pat uses the shovel to slice his head off, and the head decomposes on the floor. After this effect is filmed, Gary says "It's a wrap." Doug and John go back to NYC.

19. On Monday, March 21, 1988, an article appears in the "LA Times" titled "MGM Ponders Selling of 'Poltergeist III'"
Producer Barry Bernardi is quoted as saying he doesn't believe any scenes need to be edited in light of Heather's death.  It is mentioned that the studio plans extensive audience reaction screenings.
The article makes no mention of the re-shoot which took place the previous week (it's likely the studio intentionally didn't tell the reporter about it for publicity reasons). However, the horror SFX magazine "Gorezone" would print an article written by Doug Drexler called "Poltergeist III and a half: The Reshoot," in September of that year).


20. Apparently after these screenings, it is decided to keep the lightning bolt at the very end. Sherman didn't like this, especially after Heather's death. He clearly wanted to make P3 (at that point), the concluding chapter to the trilogy. The execs obviously felt otherwise, and the lightning was left in to both "punch up" the ending "everybody hated" and leave an open door for a "Poltergeist IV." The decision to exclude Scott probably backfires, confusing the test audiences even more by his not returning. However, the budget has run out at this point, and "Scott" is not considered vital enough to the movie for the studio to go through the expense and complication of arranging another re-shoot with Kip present. 
The film is re-submitted to the MPAA for a re-rating the week of April 18, 1988. Apparently certain aspects of the new ending (the decomposed bodies, Kane's decapitation, Tom Skerritt's looping of "fucking sonofabitch!"in an earlier scene) earn the film the desired rating of PG-13. This is announced in the Monday April 25th, Bulletin # 1008.

As Sherman went on to say in the above linked interview:
"I am very proud of the FX in the film. I think the FX are really amazing. We did accomplish what we set out to do in terms of the FX, but unfortunately with what we had to do with the rest of the film, the story and the script don’t work as well together as they should have."
Jason Bene: MGM didn’t do a lot to promote the movie. There is the trailer that came out, but it comes off as more of a teaser. They hardly showed any footage of the film. They must have been scared to put any footage of the film with Heather in it.
Gary Sherman: "It was the board who wanted the picture released and the executives at the studio really didn’t want to release the movie. I didn’t want to release the movie and I didn’t want to do any publicity. Tom didn’t want to do anything. Nancy didnt want to do anything. Zelda absolutely, one hundred percent refused to do any publicity whatsoever. She just said, “Heather’s dead, I am not doing this.” She called me and said, “What do you think I should do?” I said, “I am not doing any publicity.” I was inundated by all of the tabloids. The papaparazzi were just everywhere. All that anybody wanted to talk about was Heather dying. "
21. The film is released June 10, 1988. The reviews are scathing, and the box office receipts disappointing. Heather O'Rourke's Mother would later reach an out of court confidential settlement with Kaiser, the HMO whose misdiagnosis lead to Heather's tragic death.
22. Over 10 years later, in early 1999, Gary Sherman would begin to claim in emails to fans and in interviews that the film's ending was "not a re-shoot," that the original ending with Heather was "never shot," and that at the time of Heather's death, they still had "17 pages of script" left to film. These claims would be contradicted by multiple sources, as shown above and in much more detail here: www.poltergeistIII.com/gorezone.html).
23. When asked in early 2010 whether the original ending with Heather was filmed, and if so, did the footage still exist in the vaults, an MGM spoksperson would only say "No Comment."

Articles IV

Gary Sherman Interview Excerpt

From:
I: Do you find it a frustration making your films for an audience that might miss the points you’re trying to make?
GS: No because I feel like I’ve done my best to live a life informed by those ideas. The most important thing to me in my movies has always been my characters just like the most important thing in life should be the people around us. Even stuff I’ve done mainly for the money like Poltergeist III, which was such a nightmare. Losing Heather in the middle of it was so awful. But ultimately we tried to make a movie about how society perceived this little girl. And I’m still close to people from that project like Zelda Rubenstein.
I: Wow! Zelda’s still plugging away?
GS: Oh yeah. Zelda’s definitely alive and kickin’. I talk to her all the time. She’ll call up and talk to me in that voice of hers, “Hey Gary. How ya doin’ it’s Zelda!” She’s so sweet. I’d love to work with her again sometime.
I: Speaking of characters!
GS: Right, characters are what it’s all about though. Once you forget that the characters in your movie have to be alive for your audience you lose the whole thing, you lose the audience and the movie. My favorite films are Woody Allen films. I mean, I don’t want to make a Woody Allen film. It’s never gonna happen…

Articles: Part III

Gary Sherman Interview:
This interview excerpt is from a longer interview as conducted a few months ago by the guys over at www.iconsoffright.com.  The full version can be read at:
http://www.iconsoffright.com/IV_Gary_Sherman.htm

Interesting to know that Mr. Sherman was originally considered for the directing role on "Poltergeist II". It's a good interview, but keep in mind that his claim about Heather passing away before they could film the original ending is not accurate. For the real story (she died before they could do a RE-SHOOT of the ending), check out
http://www.poltergeistIII.com/gorezone.html/


Here's the Interview:


Q: I was 12 when ‘Poltergeist 3’ came out, and although I wasn’t initially aware of the problems thru-out the production until much later on, I really, really enjoyed it. I have very fond memories of seeing it all the time on cable. How’d you get involved in that project and was it difficult or intimidating for you to write and direct the 3 rd movie knowing that you were following up two successful films?

Sherman: First of all, I was approached to do Poltergeist 2 before Brian (Gibson). And for several reasons, I didn’t do it. I had just written a pilot for NBC, and the pilot got picked up for production and I had already committed to directing it. And also… I felt that the budget for 2 was a little over-inflated for what it needed to be. There were a lot of people involved in the production and there was a lot of money being spent on the production that wasn’t going to end up on the screen. And that’s always been a real major thing for me. When I make a movie, I want the money on the screen, I don’t want the money going into lining the pockets of all kinds of people, including myself. I think the idea is to take that money and give that money to your audience, and not keep that money for yourself. That’s the way I’ve always been with all my productions. So, anyway, it just didn’t work out when it came to Part 2.

‘Vice Squad’ had been out there already and it was a film that had gotten a lot of attention from other directors. I can’t tell you the number of director’s that contacted me after ‘Vice Squad’ and just started talking to me about what a significant film it was. It was really mind boggling for me, but also humbling to get calls from Walter Hill, and John Milius and Martin Scorcese. (laughs) John Milius had told me how he sat and watched it with Steven Speilberg and supposedly that’s how my name got brought up for Poltergeist 2. This is second hand information, but that’s what I’d heard. I wasn’t available for it, so it just didn’t work out, but when they decided to do ‘Poltergeist 3’, they came to me first before they went to anyone else and said, “Would you like to do Poltergeist 3 and would you like to produce it, write it and direct it?” The producer’s of ‘Death Line’ were at that time running MGM, and I had a long standing relationship with them, so I said OK.

I had just done ‘Wanted: Dead Or Alive’ (with Rutger Hauer) and they loved it. So, that’s what I ended up doing. It started out to be a lot of fun to do ‘Poltergeist 3’ and I’d sold them on the idea that this was going to be the last film ever made that has no CGI in it. Not only no CGI, but I didn’t want any opticals in the movie. I wanted no film tricks at all. I told them I think I can do the whole movie as a magic show and do every effect live on camera.

Question: I watch it and am baffled by the visual effects in the movie. Especially a lot of the tricks with the mirrors. Did you use pretty much everything you had learned on previous films about visual effects in ‘Poltergeist 3’?

Sherman: I used not only what I learned from my films, but I have a masters in photography and I went to a technical school, so you had to take scientific courses as well, so I studied physics in college. Optics were always a big thing for me. Another thing, while working my way thru school, I not only did it by being a session musician, but I also got myself a job at an optical laboratory once I got interested in film and learned how to use a lot of techniques that we don’t use anymore.

All the tricks that were used to do special effects before CGI came along, which included manipulating film and using blue screen. I had a background in that and I loved doing that stuff, and my career in commercials was really based on special effects because I used to do all kinds of special effects commercials. I loved the idea of doing long tracking shots and really manipulating the camera. I brought all of those things together to do ‘Poltergeist 3’.

It was a film I was really excited about making until Heather (O’ Rourke) died. (Carol Anne) It’s the great unfinished film. I don’t think anything could be more significant to a director then the film that he lost a star on.

Q: It must have been so difficult. I had read a bit of the backstory on the production, and I had read that you and a lot of the people involved in the film didn’t even want to complete it once Heather passed away.

Sherman: I didn’t want to complete it at that point. I mean, I loved that little girl. She was just so special. If I could’ve adopted her, I would have. If she could’ve been my kid, I would have absolutely loved it. She was just an amazing person and the sweetest little thing you could believe. When she died, I was in shock. I was a pallbearer at her funeral and it was probably the worst day of my entire life. There was never a sadder moment in my life then that day. You know, it was hard. I didn’t care about the film anymore. The studio said let’s just bury the film. How can you release a film with a dead 12 year old in it anyways? I think it’s awful.

And we don’t have an ending. There’s no ending shot. At the beginning, everyone agreed with me that we shouldn’t try to finish the film. And then pressure from the board at MGM changed that. They pretty much said “You finish the film, or someone else will.” And I wasn’t about to throw my footage over to someone else.

So, I wrote that little bullshit scene that now ends the movie. And we shot that little 2 second scene with a double, and the camera going back up thru the window and the lightening striking the top of the building and… it’s just… a bullshit ending. I hate it. And the rest of the movie, even after we shot that ending, the film was too short. So, I had to go back in and stretch and use scenes in the film that I had NEVER intended on using.

There are scenes that I wrote because the studio felt I need to elaborate on certain things, and I knew those scenes would never end up in the finished films, and unfortunately they did, because I had to stretch the length of the film. I think I got 77 or 78 minutes out of the first cut and so, in order to bring it up to its delivery requirements, I had to just keep stretching. So, we stretched anywhere we could. Even on that 77 minute version, we had stretched the opening titles for as long as you could possibly bear to have the opening titles go.


Q: For what it’s worth, I saw it at 12 and I loved it back then for the visuals and it left an impression on me. So, I hope that’s worth something! (laughs)

Sherman: Well, thank you. (laughs) It’s my least favorite of all my movies. In fact, I don’t think I’ve seen it since I made it. I remember every frame of it, I don’t think I’ve seen it since it was released in the theater. I have the DVD but I’ve never watched it. I’ve let other people watch it, but I have not watched it. I don’t even know what the transfer on the DVD looks like. Mainly it’s an emotional thing. I can’t watch that film and think about directing Heather and losing her. It’s pretty awful to lose someone.

We lost Jack Albertson right after ‘Dead & Buried’ and Donald Pleasence is gone now. It’s kind of strange watching films of people who were your friends and knowing that they’re gone. But when there are pleasant memories connected to it, it’s a lot easier. Because of the fact of the way she died, it just was not pleasant.

Q: It’s was a terrible tragedy.

Sherman: It was. And I think she would’ve gone on to be a great director. Seriously. At 12 years old, she knew more about filmmaking then a lot of people that are out there making films today. That’s what she wanted to do. That was her goal. She was going to stop acting, because she wanted to direct. She wanted to go to film school. And I think the world lost a really good filmmaker.


Q: I would assume that experience turned you off from filmmaking for a while?

Sherman: Well, I had done ‘Lisa’ right after, which was another horror story. The making of ‘Lisa’ was THE worst production nightmare I’ve ever gone thru. And even after the productions of the film, the release of the picture was an even bigger nightmare. I don’t want to go into all, but it was horrible. I did one film where my star died and the next film where the studio died while I was making the film. So, there was no money to release the film once the film was finished. And they forced me into doing stuff that I didn’t want to do. I really felt like slave labor on that film. Because they had taken a project I was very close to and a script that I really loved and they turned it into a piece of shit. And then didn’t release it properly. And that’s really why I decided to take a hiatus. I had had my fill. Television had been very, very good to me over the years, so I just left the world of feature films and went back to producing television.

Q: Gary, I’m so sorry! I feel like I should apologize to you!

Sherman: (laughs) It’s ok!
 

L.A. Times
March, 1988

MGM Ponders Selling of 'Poltergeist III'

By MICHAEL CIEPLY, Times Staff Writer
 
The sudden death last month of "Poltergeist III" child star Heather O'Rourke brings MGM face to face with one of the toughest dilemmas any studio's movie marketers can expect to encounter.
   The second "Poltergeist" sequel was already in the can, at a cost of more than $10 million, when the 12-year-old actress died of what had seemed to be flu symptoms, but proved to be septic shock from an unsuspected bowel obstruction.
   Now MGM has to sell the picture without seeming to exploit Heather, and without creating ghoulish confusion between screen threats to little Carol Anne Freeling and the young actress who played her.
   "We're caught in a dilemma," acknowledges MGM marketing senior vice president Barry Lorie.
   As Lorie sees it, "normal adults, and obviously fathers with daughters, like myself, might be very offended" by almost any reference to Carol Anne/Heather in a studio marketing campaign.
   O'Rourke was featured on poster ads for the first two "Poltergeist" films and is among the top name stars in the third. But Lorie can already imagine angry letters to MGM/UA Communications Co. chairman Lee Rich if the MGM division appears in any way to trade on O'Rourke's death in handling "Poltergeist III."
   Yet, says Lorie, the likely letter writers "are people who might never see the movie anyway." The "Poltergeist" audience is young and male–the same people who love such grisly fare as "Friday the 13th" and "A Nightmare on Elm Street." By Lorie's reckoning, those viewers probably won't be disturbed by O'Rourke's death.
   So how will MGM catch the eye of teen terror-fiends without deeply offending their parents? The studio hasn't firmed up marketing plans for the June 10 release yet. But some things are clear:
   –Publicity is out: Promotional interviews are a favorite tool in selling horror films, and O'Rourke did some publicity for the earlier films. But MGM wants stars Tom Skerritt and Nancy Allen generally to avoid interviews, which would inevitably lead to maudlin questions about Heather.
   MGM is particularly worried that the tabloids might try to conjure some spooky mumbo jumbo from the fact that an actor has died shortly after finishing each of the "Poltergeist" films. Dominique Dunne, Carol Anne's older sister in the first movie, was strangled to death by an ex-boyfriend in 1982. Julian Beck, who played the evil Rev. Kane in "Poltergeist II:the Other Side" died of cancer at age 60 shortly after finishing that film in 1985.
   –Testing is in: Before setting up an ad campaign-which might or might not feature O'Rourke-the studio plans extensive audience-reaction screenings. The tests might help MGM calculate how viewers take to such touches as a proposed dedication to O'Rourke, whose "They're here" and "They're back" lines helped sell the first two films.
   David Wardlow, Heather's agent and a close associate of her mother, says the film "will be dedicated to Heather. There's no question about that." But Wardlow says the survivors have no veto rights over marketing plans.
   –Meanwhile, safe is better than sorry: Scrambling to regroup after O'Rourke's death, cautious studio exectives trimmed a shot of the actress from their initial trailer. But they left in a voice-over in which she delivers the new kicker: "Guess who's back in town...?"
   In the movie, Carol Anne, still dogged by ghostly visitors, is sent to a school for gifted children and lives in Chicago with an uncle played by Skerritt and an aunt played by Allen. Producer Barry Bernardi, Lorie and Wardlow all said they didn't believe the film would need special editing to defuse any horror scenes that might seem tasteless in light of O'Rourke's death.
   Still, MGM hasn't always been as tactful in handling a death among its roster of stars.
   For instance, when 26-year-old Jean Harlow died just weeks before finishing "Saratoga" in 1937, studio chief Louis B. Mayer initially promised to discard all the footage and start from scratch rather than put out an incomplete Harlow film.
   But some film historians have speculated that it was only a publicity ploy. At any rate, Mayer quickly changed course, finishing the movie with a dubbed voice and a double who was photographed mostly from behind. The result was a big hit.
   Things worked out less well in 1981, when Natalie Wood drowned before the studio, by then known as MGM/UA, had finished "Brainstorm," a $25-million science-fiction thriller. MGM/UA quickly shut down production and filed a $15-million insurance claim with Lloyd's of London. Lloyd's gave director Douglas Trumbull $3 million to finish the movie instead, but MGM/UA decided it didn't like the result and sent Wood's last film from studio to studio in search of a new home. Finding no takers, MGM finally released "Brainstorm" in 1983, to poor audience response.
   Then there was the case of David Niven.
   When Niven died in 1983 before finishing the "Curse of the Pink Panther," the studio forged ahead, bringing in impressionist Rich Little to dub the actor's final scenes. The result was what one reviewer called an "unethical and unfunny picture." It, too, flopped.

UPDATE: In January 2006, I sent an email to Barry Lorie, who was the marketing senior vice president for MGM back in 1988 and who was quoted in the article above. I asked him if he could shed any more light on how the studio handled publicity for the film after Heather's passing. Here's what he sent me:
 
"It's too long ago for me to recall any more info than you already have. MGM wasn't too keen about the picture from the git go, and with the untimely death of the child, it was a project that sort of fell through the cracks. I'm sorry I can't be of more help. B. Lorie."

Frozen Family

This is a higher resolution pic. See the "frozen Tangina" on the floor in the background? She has her hand sticking up out of the snow.This matches the story boards I've got on my site. "Frozen Donna" can be seen at the foot of the bed, and what looks like "Frozen Bruce" on the floor behind her.
 
 

Where the hell did Scott go?!

Where the hell did Scott go?!


One of the (many) bizarre things about "Poltergeist III" is the fact that Scott (Kipley Wentz), Donna's (Lara Flynn Boyle) boyfriend, never came back from the "Other Side" at the end of the film. Early on, he was taken away into the puddle along with Donna and Carol Anne. Later, he appears to come back after being shot up from the frozen pool (above). However, it turns out that this Scott is the "evil one"-a possessed mirror reflection who later takes the elevator upstairs to the 70th floor to meet the "evil Donna" (pic below). He then rips her face open, and his fingers crack as well, revealing the undead beneath.

However, at the end of the film, in the re-shot ending, when Bruce, Donna, and Carol Anne come back, Scott is nowhere to be seen!  What's going on? Was Scott left on the Other Side?  There have been numerous explanations given for this. In the original ending, Scott did come back.
1. Director Gary Sherman claims actor Kipley Wentz was "on the east coast" and was not available for shooting when they filmed the new ending after Heather died.
2. Kipley disputes this, saying he was in LA going to USC. The re-shoot took place in the same city-at the MGM Studios. He says no one ever called him about being in the re-shoot.
3. Producer Barry Bernardi told Kip jokingly at the film's premiere in Chicago that Scott was being left "out there" for "Poltergeist IV." When pressed, Barry said things "had been really crazy, and they were just trying to deal with it as quickly as possible."
4. One of the stars of P3 (likely Tom Skerritt) said that Kip's abscence from the new ending was an "oversight" stemming from the emotional and logistical turmoil after Heather's death, and that since the budget had run out at that point, "Scott" was not deemed essential enough to the movie for the studio to go through the expense and complication of arranging another re-shoot with Kip present.
The most likely explanation in my view is that the execs decided it might confuse the audience if they saw Scott coming up from the pool and then saw him again at the end coming back with the family. They may have decided to make the Scott who emerges from the pool the "real one" and the one who walks out of the elevator the "fake one." This could have worked, since you don't see Scott actually leaving his apartment to get into the elevator. However, it becomes obvious there is something not quite right with this Scott when he's being hypnotized by Dr. Seaton. He sees Tangina and freaks out, saying "Keep her away from me!!"
Actor Kipley Wentz actually planned on doing a one man show at one point called "Saving Scott:"
from:
So I'm wavering a bit on my choice of one-man shows to develop. The idea I proposed for the workshop I'm beginning on Monday is called (working title) "Saving Scott". Many of you probably have heard this story before, but when I was 18, I got a lead role in Poltergeist III. I played Lara Flynn Boyle's boyfriend, "Scott", and the two of us were sucked to "the other side" trying to save Carol Anne and were replaced by our evil twin reflections. Seriously.
Anyway, between the time the movie was wrapped and it's release date, the star, Heather O'Rourke tragically died at age 11. That's a long story that we don't need to cover here.
So, long story short... in the original script our evil twins were running around Chicago wreaking havoc and killing people. At the climax of the movie, there is an epic battle and of course, we're all saved and it's a happy ending.
HOWEVER... due to Heather's death, the ending of the movie was reshot and... lo and behold... nobody bothered to call ol' Scotty Boy. So I'm sitting there at the premiere and there's the big climactic battle and everybody is saved, the ENTIRE CAST is there at the end... except me. Scott was nowhere to be seen. They just left him out there on "the other side".
The credits rolled, I scratched my head, and someone behind me whispered, "Wait... what happened to that dude?"
Enter: the internet, and a whole new generation of Poltergeist III fans. Seriously.
And the question has grown into a full-blown conspiracy: What the heck happened to Scott?!
Several years ago, the director gave an interview in which he said that I had been "on the East Coast at school" and was "unavailable for shooting". This is a total fabrication. I was in LA, attending USC. I had just seen everyone at Heather's funeral weeks before. I was a pall bearer.
But, people with way too much time on their hands have run with this, making me the scapegoat for this weird, lame ending. I was unaware of these internet chats happening until a couple years ago, at which point I started logging on to chat rooms and trying to set the record straight. I was there, I was available, I was never called.
This of course has only fueled the "controversy" and whipped 12 year old girls and boys into a conspiracy frenzy. The chat rooms are abuzz with points and counter points, quotes from articles, photos, transcripts of television reports, and more. I have been accused more than once of participating in some shady sort of coverup. What I'm covering up and for whose benefit hasn't yet been explained, but I must be up to SOMETHING explains LizzyGrrl98476.
In any event, what nobody else but me seems to consider is the fact that poor Scott has been stuck out there on "the other side" for the last 16 years. Meanwhile ttocS has been running free in our world, no doubt campaigning for George Bush.
As for me, I've suffered the results of my own evil impulses and also felt as though some of my most endearing qualities disappeared into the ether with what was, in all seriousness, a tragic and horrible experience that has had an enormous impact on my adult life. In essence, my "good" qualities were stolen to "the other side" and have been frozen in hellish limbo for almost 20 years.
Imagine poor, puffy-haired Scott over there on "the other side", stuck in his stupid 1987 horror-movie fashion. Imagine evil Scott running amok in our world. And there I am, stuck in the middle.
It's time to Save Scott.
Here's another link to Kipley's web site, with a great background interview of how he got the role in P3, what it was like after Heather died, etc:

Greener On Every Side

Wednesday, June 10,2015

Greener On Every Side

POLTERGEIST and E.T. feel irrevocably connected to each other and that’s just the way it is. The reasons are obvious and just as intertwined, particularly that Spielberg suburbia north of Los Angeles in some Simi Valley neighborhood that I’ve never ventured, making it feel as if both films are taking place right down the street from each other. They each also came out in the summer of ’82, only a week apart--POLTERGEIST came first, notching a strong opening weekend even though it was released the same day as the all-holy STAR TREK II: THE WRATH OF KHAN while E.T. had it a little easier the following Friday opposite GREASE 2. E.T. owned the world in the blockbuster summer of ’82 but doesn’t seem to have the same sort of cachet these days, maybe because it’s too sentimental, maybe because everyone just had enough of the thing by a certain point. It’s also long been blamed on the concurrent box office failures of the R-rated BLADE RUNNER and THE THING that same month and those films becoming officially sanctioned classics by now feels like someone atoning for some sort of cinematic sin that was committed (in truth, I’m kind of an E.T. agnostic but that’s a conversation for another time).
In addition to its ongoing popularity POLTERGEIST maintains an unending air of mystery due to people wanting to know just what went down on set between producer Steven Spielberg, who had not yet begun principal photography on E.T. at the time, and director-of-record Tobe Hooper with many reaching the conclusion that the fingerprints of Spielberg are just too obvious to ignore. But people still ask those questions, as if trying to solve the unanswered mysteries of our own childhood, something we really should have moved on from long ago, holding on to the hope that someone who’s still around will eventually write a tell-all book or do an audio commentary. There are films I’ve seen way too many times by now to get much from and POLTERGEIST may be one of them—it’s basically the equivalent of an Eagles song that I wish the classic rock station would just stop playing already. So is there anything left to say about POLTERGEIST or is it an evergreen beyond any sort of commentary?
There’s definitely not much point in spending time on a plot synopsis about the Freelings of the Cuesta Verde Estates and how their idyllic suburban existence is shattered when supernatural forces apparently abduct daughter Carol Anne, leading to the horrible secrets they discover about their beautiful home. A look at the doing away with of 60s ideals and how 70s cover-ups gave way to the corruption of the 80s, the decade is clearly forming in POLTERGESIST. With a plot (story by Steven Spielberg, screenplay by Steven Spielberg, Michael Grais and Mark Victor) that focuses on the tearing apart of the family in the one place where everything is supposed to be secure, it’s about an America that just wants to put the past away and sell out so everything can look the same, letting them just fall asleep in front of the TV, which is the one part of the house that matters most, after drinking too much beer. Unlike, say, the working class middle American couple played by Richard Dreyfuss and Teri Garr in CLOSE ENCOUNTERS, JoBeth Williams and Craig T. Nelson’s Diane and Steve Freeling apparently have some sort of counter-culture past that they’ve buried except for those nights when Diane brings out the joints while Steve reads about Reagan to rid himself of the way he was back when he ‘had an open mind’ once and for all (while A GUY NAMED JOE, later remade by Spielberg as ALWAYS, plays on the TV). Presumably this was a past when 16 year-old Diane gave birth to their first daughter, now 16 herself--I always imagine there was a break after having Dana so young considering the gap between her and the other kids so she never seems to be treated as more than a visiting relative by the family. Whatever the story is involving Dana it feels like the stuff that would interest Spielberg the least and it’s a background that feels drained out as the running time goes on in order to make them basically another suburban family in the movies.
That background at least roots POLTERGEIST in some sort of time-frame, even if it doesn’t matter that much; both films may be set in the early 80s but E.T. doesn’t have much interest in the specifics of the era beyond pop-culture ephemera and makes no bones about how its adult characters are essentially as irrelevant as the teachers in old Peanuts cartoons. POLTERGEIST, on the other hand, while it contains some of those same pop culture signposts (did the Freelings really let their kids see ALIEN?), is about the terror and desperation felt by the adults in trying to protect their children while feeling very much aware of the yuppie rot sprouting up at the beginning of the Reagan era to terrorize the American Dream. Everything’s going to be ok, says E.T., childhood can be eternal if you want it to be and that’s all that matters. POLTERGEIST seems to know that it’s not so easy. It’s a film that doesn’t have any answers. The film’s best, most potent moments are when the adults realize just how powerless they really are.
The director gets “A Tobe Hooper Film” during the opening credits but they also take the time to declare itself “A Steven Spielberg Production” at both the beginning and close of the film and I wonder if that’s a violation of some DGA bylaw. Of course, I’m hardly the first person to speculate who really directed POLTERGEIST and there’s not much point in pretending to reach a grand conclusion in regards to who’s responsible for what. There are elements that feel like Hooper, much as they’re overshadowed by the film’s producer. But it’s all just guesswork. Of course, different people who worked on the film have provided different answers when asked through the years and each one of them would have a different perspective anyway—Jerry Goldsmith, for one, was quoted as saying he never worked with Hooper at all and since Spielberg’s regular editor Michael Kahn cut this film (E.T. was in other hands) that of course causes one to reach certain conclusions.
Whatever the absolute truth is, the lived-in world of POLTERGEIST brings to it the right tone and adds immeasurably to its believability. The cluttered Freeling home has a natural feel that every Spielberg family, doesn’t right down to the eerie quiet after the kids head out to school. The plotting never feels too calculated and gets down to business surprisingly fast, with a pace that makes every second count as the tension of the first half-hour builds and we get to know the family (makes me think of that early scene which has always concluded with an odd edit—it’s been there whenever I’ve seen it in 35mm too). The film shows its affection for them while still maintaining a playful way of teasing us, whether the iconic use of that clown doll seated near Robbie’s bed or even that shot of the chair immediately after it’s pulled across the floor which makes it seem like an actual character for a brief instant. The film clearly enjoys itself in laying out the jump scares—even after all these years, when the big tree attack first happens it always occurs a few beats before I think it will. We know it’s happening eventually but Robbie doesn’t and the lack of buildup at that particular moment, almost as if the movie is willingly jumping ahead of itself, works beautifully. There is the feel that we’re also skipping past a few big chunks to keep up that pace—I always imagine more scenes of Steven at work and I can’t help but picture somebody ripping ten pages of emotional breakdown and police investigations out of the script during filming to cut to the chase faster, reminding me of how the original cut of THE EXORCIST cut out the doctor’s examination because William Friedkin knew all that was just a waste of time.
The pop nature of POLTERGEIST means there isn’t that much of a feeling of dread in this suburbia outside of ominous clouds telling us what’s coming—Steven Freeling may drink too much beer but this isn’t THE SHINING, after all. Even when the door is opened for the big rescue of Carol Anne we’re greeted with wind and flashing lights instead of horrific imagery to keep everyone away. But amidst all the light and sound and ILM effects work and monologues from Zelda Rubinstein’s Tangina Barrows it’s surprisingly small scale for what was once thought of as a summer blockbuster so what sticks out are the small moments that build to the gradual fracturing of this family, showing that in the Spielberg universe that’s a more horrifying occurence than anything having to do with the supernatural. Whatever the true motives of the spirits they’re nothing compared to the real world personified by the great James Karen (previously in ALL THE PRESIDENT’S MEN and later in NIXON, making him as ideal a figure of big business corruption imaginable) as Steven’s boss Mr. Teague—his phrasing of how they’re moving the cemetery by stating, “It’s just…people.” is so beautifully cold in how he can’t even refer to the residents of that cemetery as “they”. Things. Not individuals. They don’t matter.
There are points when I’m most interested in the characters are just being observed during the silent moments, particularly the kids, holding on Oliver Robins’ Robbie as it creates almost a full character arc out of that silence or Dominique Dunne’s Dana crying that she can’t stay in the house any longer. And maybe because the iconic nature of Zelda Rubenstein’s Tangina has become so connected to the franchise I now find myself wondering more about less flashy spinster Beatrice Straight’s pre-GHOSTBUSTERS parapsychologist Dr. Lesh and her flask of whiskey, an interesting type of character that summer movies don’t care about anymore, one who doesn’t get to do much in her last moments onscreen beyond stare lovingly at this couple, a fulfilling life that she in her stuffy academia never got to experience. Again, these outside forces are almost more of a threat to the family like Lesh’s colleague Marty (played by Martin Casella, Spielberg’s assistant on RAIDERS) wrongly raiding the Freeling’s fridge late at night looking for a steak. It’s not his house--then again, the house doesn’t belong to any of them--but he’s even more of an intruder than the Freelings are and he pays the price for it. Plus tying it all together is the score by Jerry Goldsmith (presumably because John Williams was on E.T.) which feels almost psychically connected to the characters in its emotion—if it’s not one of the best Goldsmith scores ever it at least contains one of the best cymbal crashes in a Goldsmith score ever. We never follow Diane into the closet when she goes to retrieve Carol Anne but that score almost convinces us we have, it tells us what it looks like, what it feels like.
It’s a case where I’m not entirely sure if POLTERGEIST still works because I’m so damn familiar with it or if it just works. Even after all these years I’m a little hazy on the whole go into the light/don’t go into the light confusion that throws things for a loop briefly during the Tangina setpiece, as if they’re just trying to give that part of the plot busy work before the inevitable happens. It doesn’t matter, I suppose. Whatever the parental origins, it’s hard enough to make a film that works as well as this one does after all these years. Plus it takes cojones for any film to reach a narrative point where anyone would by any logic would ever go back in the house after what’s happened, allowing the climax to take place. Maybe we buy it because the film knows it has to happen, for this family to break away from Cuesta Verde completely in the end it has to isolate them from the experts who supposedly knew everything and even their annoying neighbors who couldn’t care less. Maybe I buy it because I’ve seen the film so many times already.
The climax finally pays off a lot of what we’ve been waiting for, including the attack of JoBeth Williams which skirts the edge of R-rated sleaze, something you can imagine Tobe Hooper doing something with if he could have, but avoids it in favor of the ROYAL WEDDING-styled effects as she’s dragged up to the ceiling. Maybe they’re Spielberg ghosts, so they wouldn’t be interested in that sort of thing anyway. The climax throws everything it can at both us and the family, as if the ghosts know this is their one last chance, and it does it in the best ‘haunted house’ fashion. Maybe any problems that occurred during production helped to allow the film to be that much more effective, that much more human, making all those special effects having even more of an impact at times. And whoever it was specifically responsible for directing James Karen’s wordless final scene, the result is every bit as memorable as the quite frankly jaw-dropping implosion of the house. One friend of mine has long been convinced that Dominique Dunne’s Dana, seen incessantly eating at various points, is pregnant throughout the entire film and I’m pretty sure he’s right. She’s her mother’s daughter after all and she’s got a giant hickey on her neck at the end to prove it, just like the one Diane’s father used to check her for. The world of POLTERGEIST is one big circle and no matter how much we try to flee to some lush suburbia to avoid who we are there’s no escaping the past. We’re part of the family we’re born into and eventually we all have to deal with the bodies that have been buried a little too close whether we deserve it or not.
Again, part of the success of the film lies in the performances which keep things grounded during those stretches when the effects threaten to take things over. JoBeth Williams and Craig T. Nelson are always a completely believable couple and so much of how they interact with each other feels totally genuine. Points to the film as well for giving Williams a slightly stronger role and she’s just wonderful while Nelson never seems afraid to let his vulnerability come through. The kids are most effective when they’re not trying to be movie-cute, when it seems like the camera is just catching them, Heather O’Rourke during certain playful moments, Oliver Robins and his voice cracking during his whispered conversation with Beatrice Straight late at night, Dominique Dunne keeping her secrets while still very much just a teenager. The adults playing against them—Straight, Karen, Rubinstein and Richard Lawson—help keeping things immeasurably grounded and are a big part of why the effect of the film still holds, from our childhood all the way to us finding ourselves relating more to those adults in various ways. And for a film reference that has nothing to do with STAR WARS action figures Joseph Walsh, screenwriter of the Robert Altman gambling classic CALIFORNIA SPLIT (which Spielberg almost directed), is the one who shouts, “I bet my life on this game!” during the remote control battle at the start.
Thinking back to the summer of ’82, POLTERGEIST and E.T. have always been connected in my head as well even though I’m pretty sure I never saw POLTERGEIST until it hit cable a year later. I’m guessing my parents felt the film, originally given an R rating by the MPAA before it was downgraded to a PG, was too much for me. So my initial memories are from watching it on TV but I’d imagine that along with BLADE RUNNER and THE THING multiple viewings helped to serve as a sort of gateway drug for me towards darker films, even if POLTERGEIST seems to belong to the school of the family friendly Spielberg multiplex of the 80s than the pages of Fangoria. The silence at the end right before the end credits roll, as if the movie is stopping on an unresolved note more than actually reaching a true climax, feels appropriate for a film that seems to end with the characters turning their back on the outside world, on technology, on the future, on the 80s. That could never last forever, of course, but it’s a nice final shot. As the credits roll the Goldsmith score tries to tell us that the family will endure, complete with little girls laughing at the very end and we can believe that as long as we want. What came next, aside from real life tragedies and eternal queries about the production, has mostly been tossed aside which is almost surprising considering how even the JAWS sequels are used as punchlines nowadays. The non-Hooper/Spielberg (but with the same writers) POLTERGEIST II: THE OTHER SIDE is mostly forgotten now and a second sequel made by others was compromised by the death of Heather O’Rourke several months before release. That one’s pretty much forgotten too. Not to mention a recent remake but I don’t care about that and you don’t either so it doesn’t matter. At this point in time POLTERGEIST is pretty much at the breaking point where I’ll never need to see it again. But eventually I’m sure I will anyway, on one of those nights where I want to remember what it was once like to go to the movies during the summer. Those mysteries stay alive in your head, whether you want to keep the ghosts that are in there buried or not.

2 comments:

Joe Martino said...
To add more gasoline to the fire about who directed what – a good friend of mine Guy McElwaine was in the movie playing one of the friends over to watch the football game before the battle of the remotes erupted. He was Spielberg’s agent at the time and said Steven directed that scene. Tobe Hooper was nowhere on set.
Mr. Peel aka Peter Avellino said...
Very interesting! Another piece of the puzzle. I've heard of him but never knew he was in this film. Thanks for passing that along.