When working on my initial
“Gorezone” article, I was informed that their office had received a
statement from a source who worked on the film, regarding why Kip
Wentz’s character “Scott” wasn't included in the re-shoot:
"It
was an oversight stemming from the emotional and logistical turmoil
over the loss of Heather O'Rourke, in her 'iconic' role as the series'
central character; and the budget had run out at that point [after the re-shoot had taken place],
with 'Scott' not being considered essential enough to the movie for the
studio to go through the expense and complication of arranging another
re-shoot with Kip present. This
turned out to be a terrible blow to the young actor's self-esteem, and a
classically painful 'Hollywood Experience', resulting in more than a
decade of career and emotional 'free-fall' (which, reportedly, he has
fully recovered from in recent years)."
In regard to Heathers death:
"As
explained in the news reports at the time, if only they had seen a
specialist when her unusual symptoms first appeared (instead of blindly
accepting the typical HMO 'shrug and runaround' style of care they had,
even when she was healthy), she would have easily been put back to
normal, vibrant health; and most likely would be alive and well at the
present time. Though life-threatening, a bit of fairly unremarkable
surgery would have completely restored her physical condition, if caught
in time."
I’ve
also heard from a source who claimed that the original ending from
“Poltergeist III” still exists within the archives at MGM. I of course
have no way to confirm this tip, but perhaps MGM will one day shed some
light on the issue. After all, they stand to make some extra money if
they put any cut scenes on a special edition DVD, especially after all
this controversy. Here’s an interesting excerpt from the “Poltergeist
III” press kit, given to the media by MGM at the time of the film's
release (emphasis mine):
HEATHER
O'ROURKE, who died unexpectedly in February, 1988 from complications of
a congenital intestinal disorder, made her film debut at age five in
"Poltergeist," and was nine when she reprised her role as Carol Anne in
"Poltergeist II: The Other Side." Heather was just 11 when she filmed
"Poltergeist III," which was completed several months before her untimely death.
Here’s a posting that Tammy, Heather O’Rourke’s older sister, made in 2003 to the www.heatherorourke.net memorial site message board (again, emphasis mine):
Q: Hey Tammy, why did Heather like flamingos so much? About how old would you say she was when she started to like them? Thanks
Tammy:
She enjoyed the flamingos because they were so pretty. She went to Florida after filming Poltergeist 3 and that's when she fell in love with them.
Here’s
an excerpt from the interview I did with Corey Burton, the man who
provided the voice for the Rev. Kane in “Poltergeist III:”
Q: One of the things I've always wondered about is the film's re-shot ending. Did you ever do any dubs for the original ending?
Burton:
I do remember going in to record after Heather’s tragically untimely
death; and I may have recorded a little something at the first session [the PG rated cut of the film, in 1987]...
But I seem to recall that it was already established, that the ending
would be reworked, and Gary Sherman didn’t want to waste studio time
recording what would most likely not be used anyway.
Q:
One thing that always bugged me about the very end of the movie is when
lightning strikes the building just before the credits go up, and
Kane's laughter is heard, presumably leaving an open door for yet
another sequel. Did Gary/MGM ask you to do that scene with the express
purpose of a possible sequel in mind, or was it just a last ditch effort
to "punch up" the ending after Heather died, when they were forced to
come up with that abrupt ending?
Burton: Both assumptions are correct.
This is what the (very reliable) urban legend web site www.snopes.com had to say about the “Poltergeist Curse:”
"O'Rourke
appeared in all three Poltergeist movies. Poltergeist III had been
completed at the time of her death although it had yet to be released,
leading to rumors that she had expired during shooting and a double had
to be used to complete the picture. (Poltergeist III was in the can by
June 1987 but wasn't released until 10 June 1988; however,
writer-director Gary Sherman decided to
change the ending of the already-finished film after O'Rourke's death,
so a double was used to shoot the alternate ending.)"
More
"smoking gun" evidence: According to the revised shooting schedule
below, dated 6/19/87, the original ending sequences were filmed on
Tuesday, June 23rd and Wednesday, June 24th. Notice also that it says
"Completion of principal photography" by Thursday of that week.
Finally,
the key piece of evidence proving that “Poltergeist III” was finished
at the time of Heather’s death is the fact that the film was originally
rated PG in 1987, the week of November 23, 1987, to be exact. I learned
this from Joan Graves, the head of the Motion Picture Association of
America Ratings Board. According to Joan:
“We
always see the entire film before issuing a rating. There have been
times when computer graphic effects have been incomplete initially but
we see a complete version before a final rating is given.”
The re-shoot took place the week of March 14, 1988. Apparently
the planning for it began in December 1987. Doug’s notes on the new SFX
continued into January, and the re-shoot may have been initially
scheduled for February. After Heather died February 1st, the re-shoot
got pushed back to March. It was announced the week of April
25, 1988 by the MPAA that "Poltergeist III" had been “re-edited” and
was awarded a new rating of PG-13, apparently satisfying the studio
heads. The scene of Kane getting his head sliced off with the shovel was
probably the deal breaker that upped the rating from PG to PG13.
Perhaps
we'll never know exactly what really happened with "Poltergeist III"
after Heather O’Rourke’s tragic death. Maybe one day MGM will dig into
its archives to see what, if any, footage still exists. If the original
ending can be found, it would only be fair that her fans be allowed to
see it. It was confirmed to me by MGM PR in 2006
that there are over 100 boxes of footage related to the film in their
vaults...perhaps the original ending can be found there.
One
last note: I emailed this article to Mr. Sherman’s PR firm, in the
hopes he‘d provide a comment in response that I could include before I
submitted the final version to "Gorezone." I never heard anything back.
******************************
NOTES:
*=In
prepping my articles, I attempted to obtain statements from multiple
cast/crew members, including the PR reps for Tom Skerritt, Nancy Allen,
Lara Flynn Boyle, Nathan Davis, and Zelda Rubinstein. Nancy Allen's PR
contact refused any interview requests when I contacted them. I never
heard back from Lara Flynn Boyle's PR person. Nathan Davis sent me a
handwritten note in the mail which said "David...sorry I can't help
you." "Gorezone" did do a brief interview with Zelda via phone, but
unfortunately she claimed not to remember much about the ending, and her
interview wasn't used (the staff told me later that she seemed "rude"
on the phone when asked about the issue, as though she just didn't want
to talk about it). Tom Skerritt has always refused interview requests
about the film.
Here's the interview "Gorezone" did with Zelda:
GZ: Was the ending completed and ready to be put together before Heather's death?
Zelda: Maybe.
GZ: Do you recall the original death of Kane? Was it filmed? Was it the head explosion?
Zelda: Could have been.
GZ: Do you prefer the original ending or the re-shoot?
Zelda: Yes.
GZ:
Joe Renzetti made the following statement. Can you confirm it or deny
it? "The special FX make-up sucked, the characters were supposed to be
frozen but they looked as if they just survived an egg processing plant
explosion."
Zelda: No I cannot confirm it. NO.
GZ: Did MGM put pressure on everyone involved to take part in the re-shoot, and why was Kipley not asked back?
Zelda: No.
Zelda
also did this interview with Iconsoffright.com in October 2007, for the
promotion of the "Poltergeist" 25th Anniversary DVD. She seems to have
again offered a wishy washy response regarding the re-shoot:
Q: What about the rumors that multiple endings had been shot for "POLTERGEIST III?"
A:
The
ending that I did was what I saw on screen. If there were other endings
it must have been done because Gary Sherman wasn't happy. Gary's a good
director, and he's also remained a good friend.
Finally,
the following is what craft services man Michael Kehoe told me. He
worked on the re-shot ending in Los Angeles. He also knew the first
assistant director on the original film, who happened to share the same
last name:
David, I
have worked on so many films that most of the past is but a blur. I was
the craft service person on that picture [P3] and knew the first
assistant director. We happen to share the same last name, no
relationship. I am writing and directing now as well as keeping the
craft service biz alive while handing the torch to someone else. I do
remember the shots with the new girl and remember her being a little
larger than Heather the original actress. I also remember them being
cautious about covering her face. It was an odd shoot to say the least
but I know that Gary Sherman had a great deal of weight on his shoulders
in regards to this film. And the tragedy of the loss of two young
actresses Heather and Dominique was a shame. I wish I had more
interesting information to share but it seems that you have just about
all the info there already.
UPDATE: In
early 2010, I wrote another follow up article for "Gorezone," laying
out much of the same info presented above. The magazine and I both tried
to obtain an official statement from MGM on whether the original ending
with Heather was filmed, and if so, did the footage still exist in the
archives. Initially, this is the email that Emma Woodwood, "Gorezone's"
marketing staff member, received from MGM's PR office:
****************
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 8:48 PM
Subject: Poltergeist 3
Hi Emma,
I wanted to let you know we are working hard to find the lost scene of Poltergeist 3. I will keep you updated on our progress.
Matt-- Matt Griffin
Marketing Corporate PR & Research Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. 10250 Constellation Blvd. 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067
***********************
However,
after she followed up on the phone with MGM a couple weeks later, Emma
sent me the following information in a series of emails:
*************************I
have chased MGM and they have spoken with key crew members and will get
back to me soon. They can confirm that they are under the understanding
there are two endings but cannot comment in writing.....
They
cannot comment at this stage as they haven't got a yes or a no from the
official body. They haven't checked the archives from what I understand
as of yet.....
I
spoke to MGM again yesterday. They still cannot give us an answer as of
yet. My hope has dropped as well as they have said they need to speak
with the director before anything else as he will know if it was or
wasn't filmed.....
*************************A
few days later, "Gorezone's" editor Bryn Hammond spoke on the phone
with Matt Griffin, the PR staffer who sent the first email. According to
Bryn, below is a basic summary of what was said:
Matt: "We are doing our best to locate the footage which is in the vaults. It's taking longer than we expected and we have had to contact our legal team with concerns regarding the matter."
Bryn: "Can I get this in an email today?"
Matt: "I will send you something over in the next couple of hours. Can I take your email?"
However, no email was sent that day. The next day, Emma received this email from Matt:
******************************
----- Original Message -----
From: Matt Griffin
To: Emma Woodwood
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: Poltergeist 3
Hi Emma,
Brian
Hammond, as I remember his name, contact our office yesterday and
wanted an official quote as to whereabouts of the missing Poltergeist 3
scenes.
Could you send me his email and contact number?
Thanks for your help,
Matt
************************
Soon
after, MGM's then Director of Corporate Publicity, Grey Munford (who no
longer works for the studio), sent this message to Bryn:
*************************
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grey Munford"
To: "Bryn Hammond"
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 7:42 PM
Subject: Poltergeist 3
Hello Bryn,
We do not have any comment but are continuing to look for information
regarding your questions.
Many thanks,
Grey Munford
******************
Bryn
then responded to Grey in a series of perplexed messages trying to get
clarification, since it was odd that Grey's assistant Matt had seemingly
admitted (on the phone) that the original ending footage was "in the
vaults," but that now only a "no comment" was being issued as an
official statement (likely because of the MGM Legal Department's sudden
involvement).
In response, Mr. Munford claimed that Bryn had
"misunderstood" Matt's reference to "vault" and only re-iterated his "No
comment at this time" statement. He did again say they were
"continuing" to look into the matter.
After Bryn forwarded me
these odd exchanges, I attempted a follow up with Mr. Munford directly
via email. Here's what I received:
"We are going to stick with 'no comment' on this situation."
(Interestingly, this time the "we're continuing to look into it" was NOT included).
Needless to say, we never got another response from MGM.
"It
was an oversight stemming from the emotional and logistical turmoil
over the loss of Heather O'Rourke, in her 'iconic' role as the series'
central character; and the budget had run out at that point [after the re-shoot had taken place],
with 'Scott' not being considered essential enough to the movie for the
studio to go through the expense and complication of arranging another
re-shoot with Kip present. This
turned out to be a terrible blow to the young actor's self-esteem, and a
classically painful 'Hollywood Experience', resulting in more than a
decade of career and emotional 'free-fall' (which, reportedly, he has
fully recovered from in recent years)."
I’ve also heard from a source who claimed that the original ending from “Poltergeist III” still exists within the archives at MGM. I of course have no way to confirm this tip, but perhaps MGM will one day shed some light on the issue. After all, they stand to make some extra money if they put any cut scenes on a special edition DVD, especially after all this controversy. Here’s an interesting excerpt from the “Poltergeist III” press kit, given to the media by MGM at the time of the film's release (emphasis mine):
In regard to Heathers death:
"As
explained in the news reports at the time, if only they had seen a
specialist when her unusual symptoms first appeared (instead of blindly
accepting the typical HMO 'shrug and runaround' style of care they had,
even when she was healthy), she would have easily been put back to
normal, vibrant health; and most likely would be alive and well at the
present time. Though life-threatening, a bit of fairly unremarkable
surgery would have completely restored her physical condition, if caught
in time."
I’ve also heard from a source who claimed that the original ending from “Poltergeist III” still exists within the archives at MGM. I of course have no way to confirm this tip, but perhaps MGM will one day shed some light on the issue. After all, they stand to make some extra money if they put any cut scenes on a special edition DVD, especially after all this controversy. Here’s an interesting excerpt from the “Poltergeist III” press kit, given to the media by MGM at the time of the film's release (emphasis mine):
HEATHER
O'ROURKE, who died unexpectedly in February, 1988 from complications of
a congenital intestinal disorder, made her film debut at age five in
"Poltergeist," and was nine when she reprised her role as Carol Anne in
"Poltergeist II: The Other Side." Heather was just 11 when she filmed
"Poltergeist III," which was completed several months before her untimely death.
Here’s a posting that Tammy, Heather O’Rourke’s older sister, made in 2003 to the www.heatherorourke.net memorial site message board (again, emphasis mine):
Q: Hey Tammy, why did Heather like flamingos so much? About how old would you say she was when she started to like them? Thanks
Tammy:
She enjoyed the flamingos because they were so pretty. She went to Florida after filming Poltergeist 3 and that's when she fell in love with them.
Tammy:
She enjoyed the flamingos because they were so pretty. She went to Florida after filming Poltergeist 3 and that's when she fell in love with them.
Here’s
an excerpt from the interview I did with Corey Burton, the man who
provided the voice for the Rev. Kane in “Poltergeist III:”
Q: One of the things I've always wondered about is the film's re-shot ending. Did you ever do any dubs for the original ending?
Burton:
I do remember going in to record after Heather’s tragically untimely
death; and I may have recorded a little something at the first session [the PG rated cut of the film, in 1987]...
But I seem to recall that it was already established, that the ending
would be reworked, and Gary Sherman didn’t want to waste studio time
recording what would most likely not be used anyway.
Q:
One thing that always bugged me about the very end of the movie is when
lightning strikes the building just before the credits go up, and
Kane's laughter is heard, presumably leaving an open door for yet
another sequel. Did Gary/MGM ask you to do that scene with the express
purpose of a possible sequel in mind, or was it just a last ditch effort
to "punch up" the ending after Heather died, when they were forced to
come up with that abrupt ending?
Burton: Both assumptions are correct.
This is what the (very reliable) urban legend web site www.snopes.com had to say about the “Poltergeist Curse:”
"O'Rourke
appeared in all three Poltergeist movies. Poltergeist III had been
completed at the time of her death although it had yet to be released,
leading to rumors that she had expired during shooting and a double had
to be used to complete the picture. (Poltergeist III was in the can by
June 1987 but wasn't released until 10 June 1988; however,
writer-director Gary Sherman decided to
change the ending of the already-finished film after O'Rourke's death,
so a double was used to shoot the alternate ending.)"
More
"smoking gun" evidence: According to the revised shooting schedule
below, dated 6/19/87, the original ending sequences were filmed on
Tuesday, June 23rd and Wednesday, June 24th. Notice also that it says
"Completion of principal photography" by Thursday of that week.
Perhaps
we'll never know exactly what really happened with "Poltergeist III"
after Heather O’Rourke’s tragic death. Maybe one day MGM will dig into
its archives to see what, if any, footage still exists. If the original
ending can be found, it would only be fair that her fans be allowed to
see it. It was confirmed to me by MGM PR in 2006
that there are over 100 boxes of footage related to the film in their
vaults...perhaps the original ending can be found there.
One
last note: I emailed this article to Mr. Sherman’s PR firm, in the
hopes he‘d provide a comment in response that I could include before I
submitted the final version to "Gorezone." I never heard anything back.
******************************
NOTES:
*=In
prepping my articles, I attempted to obtain statements from multiple
cast/crew members, including the PR reps for Tom Skerritt, Nancy Allen,
Lara Flynn Boyle, Nathan Davis, and Zelda Rubinstein. Nancy Allen's PR
contact refused any interview requests when I contacted them. I never
heard back from Lara Flynn Boyle's PR person. Nathan Davis sent me a
handwritten note in the mail which said "David...sorry I can't help
you." "Gorezone" did do a brief interview with Zelda via phone, but
unfortunately she claimed not to remember much about the ending, and her
interview wasn't used (the staff told me later that she seemed "rude"
on the phone when asked about the issue, as though she just didn't want
to talk about it). Tom Skerritt has always refused interview requests
about the film.
Here's the interview "Gorezone" did with Zelda:
GZ: Was the ending completed and ready to be put together before Heather's death?
Zelda: Maybe.
GZ: Do you recall the original death of Kane? Was it filmed? Was it the head explosion?
Zelda: Could have been.
GZ: Do you prefer the original ending or the re-shoot?
Zelda: Yes.
GZ:
Joe Renzetti made the following statement. Can you confirm it or deny
it? "The special FX make-up sucked, the characters were supposed to be
frozen but they looked as if they just survived an egg processing plant
explosion."
Zelda: No I cannot confirm it. NO.
GZ: Did MGM put pressure on everyone involved to take part in the re-shoot, and why was Kipley not asked back?
Zelda: No.
Zelda
also did this interview with Iconsoffright.com in October 2007, for the
promotion of the "Poltergeist" 25th Anniversary DVD. She seems to have
again offered a wishy washy response regarding the re-shoot:
Q: What about the rumors that multiple endings had been shot for "POLTERGEIST III?"
A:
The
ending that I did was what I saw on screen. If there were other endings
it must have been done because Gary Sherman wasn't happy. Gary's a good
director, and he's also remained a good friend.
Finally,
the following is what craft services man Michael Kehoe told me. He
worked on the re-shot ending in Los Angeles. He also knew the first
assistant director on the original film, who happened to share the same
last name:
David, I
have worked on so many films that most of the past is but a blur. I was
the craft service person on that picture [P3] and knew the first
assistant director. We happen to share the same last name, no
relationship. I am writing and directing now as well as keeping the
craft service biz alive while handing the torch to someone else. I do
remember the shots with the new girl and remember her being a little
larger than Heather the original actress. I also remember them being
cautious about covering her face. It was an odd shoot to say the least
but I know that Gary Sherman had a great deal of weight on his shoulders
in regards to this film. And the tragedy of the loss of two young
actresses Heather and Dominique was a shame. I wish I had more
interesting information to share but it seems that you have just about
all the info there already.
UPDATE: In
early 2010, I wrote another follow up article for "Gorezone," laying
out much of the same info presented above. The magazine and I both tried
to obtain an official statement from MGM on whether the original ending
with Heather was filmed, and if so, did the footage still exist in the
archives. Initially, this is the email that Emma Woodwood, "Gorezone's"
marketing staff member, received from MGM's PR office:
****************
Hi Emma,
I wanted to let you know we are working hard to find the lost scene of Poltergeist 3. I will keep you updated on our progress.
Matt-- Matt Griffin
Marketing Corporate PR & Research Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. 10250 Constellation Blvd. 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067
***********************
However, after she followed up on the phone with MGM a couple weeks later, Emma sent me the following information in a series of emails:
*************************I have chased MGM and they have spoken with key crew members and will get back to me soon. They can confirm that they are under the understanding there are two endings but cannot comment in writing.....
They cannot comment at this stage as they haven't got a yes or a no from the official body. They haven't checked the archives from what I understand as of yet.....
I spoke to MGM again yesterday. They still cannot give us an answer as of yet. My hope has dropped as well as they have said they need to speak with the director before anything else as he will know if it was or wasn't filmed.....
*************************A few days later, "Gorezone's" editor Bryn Hammond spoke on the phone with Matt Griffin, the PR staffer who sent the first email. According to Bryn, below is a basic summary of what was said:
Matt: "We are doing our best to locate the footage which is in the vaults. It's taking longer than we expected and we have had to contact our legal team with concerns regarding the matter."
******************************
Hi Emma,
Brian Hammond, as I remember his name, contact our office yesterday and wanted an official quote as to whereabouts of the missing Poltergeist 3 scenes.
Could you send me his email and contact number?
Thanks for your help,
Matt
************************
Soon after, MGM's then Director of Corporate Publicity, Grey Munford (who no longer works for the studio), sent this message to Bryn:
*************************
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grey Munford"
To: "Bryn Hammond"
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 7:42 PM
Subject: Poltergeist 3
Hello Bryn,
We do not have any comment but are continuing to look for information
regarding your questions.
Many thanks,
Grey Munford
******************
Bryn then responded to Grey in a series of perplexed messages trying to get clarification, since it was odd that Grey's assistant Matt had seemingly admitted (on the phone) that the original ending footage was "in the vaults," but that now only a "no comment" was being issued as an official statement (likely because of the MGM Legal Department's sudden involvement).
In response, Mr. Munford claimed that Bryn had "misunderstood" Matt's reference to "vault" and only re-iterated his "No comment at this time" statement. He did again say they were "continuing" to look into the matter.
After Bryn forwarded me these odd exchanges, I attempted a follow up with Mr. Munford directly via email. Here's what I received:
"We are going to stick with 'no comment' on this situation."
(Interestingly, this time the "we're continuing to look into it" was NOT included).
Needless to say, we never got another response from MGM.
****************
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 8:48 PM
Subject: Poltergeist 3
Hi Emma,
I wanted to let you know we are working hard to find the lost scene of Poltergeist 3. I will keep you updated on our progress.
Matt-- Matt Griffin
Marketing Corporate PR & Research Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. 10250 Constellation Blvd. 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067
***********************
However, after she followed up on the phone with MGM a couple weeks later, Emma sent me the following information in a series of emails:
*************************I have chased MGM and they have spoken with key crew members and will get back to me soon. They can confirm that they are under the understanding there are two endings but cannot comment in writing.....
They cannot comment at this stage as they haven't got a yes or a no from the official body. They haven't checked the archives from what I understand as of yet.....
I spoke to MGM again yesterday. They still cannot give us an answer as of yet. My hope has dropped as well as they have said they need to speak with the director before anything else as he will know if it was or wasn't filmed.....
*************************A few days later, "Gorezone's" editor Bryn Hammond spoke on the phone with Matt Griffin, the PR staffer who sent the first email. According to Bryn, below is a basic summary of what was said:
Matt: "We are doing our best to locate the footage which is in the vaults. It's taking longer than we expected and we have had to contact our legal team with concerns regarding the matter."
Bryn: "Can I get this in an email today?"
Matt: "I will send you something over in the next couple of hours. Can I take your email?"
However, no email was sent that day. The next day, Emma received this email from Matt:
******************************
----- Original Message -----
From: Matt Griffin
To: Emma Woodwood
To: Emma Woodwood
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: Poltergeist 3
Brian Hammond, as I remember his name, contact our office yesterday and wanted an official quote as to whereabouts of the missing Poltergeist 3 scenes.
Could you send me his email and contact number?
Thanks for your help,
Matt
************************
Soon after, MGM's then Director of Corporate Publicity, Grey Munford (who no longer works for the studio), sent this message to Bryn:
*************************
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grey Munford"
To: "Bryn Hammond"
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 7:42 PM
Subject: Poltergeist 3
Hello Bryn,
We do not have any comment but are continuing to look for information
regarding your questions.
Many thanks,
Grey Munford
******************
Bryn then responded to Grey in a series of perplexed messages trying to get clarification, since it was odd that Grey's assistant Matt had seemingly admitted (on the phone) that the original ending footage was "in the vaults," but that now only a "no comment" was being issued as an official statement (likely because of the MGM Legal Department's sudden involvement).
In response, Mr. Munford claimed that Bryn had "misunderstood" Matt's reference to "vault" and only re-iterated his "No comment at this time" statement. He did again say they were "continuing" to look into the matter.
After Bryn forwarded me these odd exchanges, I attempted a follow up with Mr. Munford directly via email. Here's what I received:
"We are going to stick with 'no comment' on this situation."
(Interestingly, this time the "we're continuing to look into it" was NOT included).
Needless to say, we never got another response from MGM.
No comments:
Post a Comment